Skip to main content

An example of standardized answers from the European parties in power

... and another proof of their devotion to neoliberalism

by system failure

Standardised answers from the European parties in power is a characteristic that someone can easily observe especially during the period of economic crisis. The uniformity of arguments is quite impressive through the whole eurozone, despite the special conditions in each country, and this is another indication of the pan-european unification of the neoliberal forces against political parties that threaten their domination.

Such an example is a discussion between Hannes Swoboda, of the European Socialists in euro-parliament and Joseph Paul, of the European People's Party, for the France24 network and EuroparlTV of the euro-parliament.

The journalist asks among other things: “Up till now, the two large groups have shared the European Parliament, 2,5 years each, as neither of you could form an absolute majority. Will that change much this time?

Among other things, Daul says that: “On 25 May we'll wait for the election results. [...] but I think the democratic parties will keep the majority in the Parliament.

Here, one can see clearly the dominant perception of the European parties in power. It's the same perception that is continuously propagated by the mainstream media, which is that, only the parties from the "centre" should be considered "democratic", as if they have the "copyright" of Democracy. They are of course the same parties that completely adopted cruel austerity and have chosen to save banks instead of people. They are the same parties that criminalized demonstrations in Spain and Greece. They are the same parties that are trying to destroy the social state in Europe. They show us clearly how they realize democracy.

To another question, Swoboda says among other things: “The centre dominates the evolution of the policy in Europe. It's the centre right and the centre left. Secondly, one must observe that these aren't concrete proposals from the far left or the far right. Thye're a facade with no content. They're words and mainly negative words. We cannot build a strong Europe, a Europe that serves the interests of citizens, with words. We need actions, visions and concrete proposals. And we, the Socialists offer concrete proposals.

Daul rushes to agree:

... but, as Hannes Swoboda said, we can't manage policy just with slogans.

Here is clear that, the political thinking of the European parties in power coincides perfectly by considering that they are the only ones that have concrete suggestions. This standardised "argument" is used all the time in Greece too by the parties of the government coalition. It is so standardised that ends to be a ... slogan.

This shows that there is a central management of the way with which the parties in power face the rival political forces in Europe, which means that, the parties in power in Greece - a country, which is the centre of the European crisis - are taking probably specific orders from the corresponding parties in Europe to use a specific rhetoric.

But this is also an indication of the unification of the neoliberal lobby, which is self-considered as "moderate centre" and thinks that it is the only one that has "realistic" proposals in contrast with the "far" Left for example. It's not a surprise since these proposals are totally favor big capital's interests which funds to a great extend those parties.

Socialists, especially, instead of criticize the proposals of the Left, they prefer to propagate that the Left has no proposals. This is also something that someone should expect, as Socialists appear that they are trying desperately to regain the "exclusivity" of the social sensitiveness.

An independent Left as a pure representative of people's anger against big capital interests, cannot be easily managed. Socialists, instead, can be good to everyone: on the one hand they vote every bill in favor of the big capital which funds them, on the other hand, they pretend that they fight for the majority's rights, throwing a few "crumbs" to the people to justify their "Socialistic" ideology and heritage.

Swoboda's anxiety to the next question is characteristic:

Journalist question: “On the other hand, during the crisis, it's a fact that a lot of people expected the Socialists to have a response. That response didn't come and you didn't act as the counterbalance to austerity.

Swoboda: “We did respond, but we don't have the majority. That's why we are fighting for a social Europe, a Europe without austerity, a Europe that respects social rules, a Europe that wants to improve transform and change the directive on the posting of workers. We need to change Europe. We're not defending the Europe of today. We need change and that's our response.

Swoboda forgot that the destructive IMF was brought by his colleague, president of the Socialist International, George Papandreou, that the head of IMF then was another "Socialist", Dominique Strauss-Kahn and that, the man who replaced Papandreou in the Greek Socialist Party (PASOK) leadership, Evangelos Venizelos, has chosen to adopt politics of destruction by making a coalition with the neoliberal Right in order to stay in power.

He also forgot that, Socialists in the euro-parliament allowed a nationalist, Nigel Farage, to monopolize the reaction against politics of destruction and therefore, allow his popularity reach high levels and gain high percentage for his party. Farage, for his own reasons of course, dared to say truths when his party had minimum power in the euro-parliament. Where were the "Socialists" then?

Additionaly, his rhetoric appears to be characterized with something that himself blames the Left and the "far": it is full of generalities, wishes and therefore without substantial proposals.

In a next question, journalist asks: “Mr. Swoboda, in Greece we've seen that the economic crisis has brought to the fore the Greek far left in the person of Alexis Tsipras who is the driving force. Do you not think today that in the end you will lose a whole section of your voters who will move to the far left? In addition, this Greek far left has a figurehead, Alexis Tsipras, who might stand as President of the Commission. Don't you think you could lose support?

The answer of Swoboda: “Yes, in some countries like Greece we'll lose a few voters. That's true. It's because of the crisis but it's also the response to the crisis. I was, for example, against the Troika because it would like to destroy the social resources or to destroy the social state. That's why the far left has gained support. And that's why we, as Socialists, have asked the European Commission and the majority of contributors, the majority of the EPP and the Member States, to change the structure. Greece must be reformed, but without this destruction of the social state. We must clearly stop the work of the Troika. We must ask for practical reforms of the state, but there must be respect for the needs of the social strata. [...] What are Mr. Tsipras' alternatives? He can't propose any alternatives.

What is remarkable here is that SYRIZA is considered far Left, despite the fact that its leader is a candidate for the leadership of the European Commission! But there is also a big contradiction in Swoboda's arguments since he states clearly that he is against Troika's policies and that these policies must change so that the destruction of the social state to be stopped, but instead of seeking a support from the "far" Left, which is coordinated to this perception, he insists on seeking alliances with the European People's Party, which is basically responsible for the adoption of those neoliberal, destructive policies through the whole Europe!

Next, Swoboda insists on the standardised "argument" concerning the lack of an alternative proposition from the Left, targeting personally Alexis Tsipras, but it seems that he ignores the fact that his Socialist colleague in the euro-parliament, Hoang Ngoc, quite recently, contradicted Othmar Karas of the European People's Party, who supported (as expected), that Tsipras has no realistic proposals. Ngoc said that SYRIZA's president came in Strasbourg with specific proposals.

Swoboda's answer to a next question clearly shows that Socialists are determined to support the neoliberal Right in Europe, excluding any possible alliance with the "uncompromising" Left:

Journalist: “When we see that the European United Left could become the third party, could overtake the Liberals and perhaps make unnatural alliances, could you see yourself making an alliance with that group?

Swoboda: “No. We make alliances with parties in the centre. Of course, we have discussions about specific collaborations with the far left, if the far left can accept the rules of democracy, can accept the rules for participating in practical negotiations. But we've often found the far left in this Hemicycle making demands upon demands, but if the vote is needed to support a pragmatic solution, a compromise, they withdraw support. It's unacceptable.

It would be useful if Swoboda could make clear what he means by saying "pragmatic solution" and "compromise". Does he mean the full retreat of the Socialists to the neoliberal doctrine? Who is the one who decides about the rules of Democracy? Banks or multinational corporations?

Comments

  1. Anonymous26/2/14 05:12

    Outstanding story there. What occurred after? Take care!

    My blog post; τεχνικός υπολογιστών

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oct. 7 Reports Implode: Beheaded Babies, NY Times Scandal, & More

Glenn Greenwald    

Israel’s Descent Into Madness & the Holocaust Comparison

BreakThrough News   Rania Khalek was joined by Tarik Cyril Amar, a historian from Germany and associate professor at Koc University in Istanbul, to discuss Israel’s descent into genocidal fascism. Prof. Amar addresses whether it’s useful to make Holocaust and Nazi comparisons and the real reason behind the West’s unshakeable loyalty attitude when it comes to Israel’s barbarism.   

Zionist and US imperialist criminals are about to grab the natural gas off shore Gaza

globinfo freexchange   As the genocide against Palestinians of Gaza is about to be completed with an act of unprecedented brutality by the Zionists and butcher Netanyahu through the bombardment of about 1.4 million civilians in Rafah, it seems that they have already set their next primary goal. Which, in short, is to grab the natural gas resources off shore Gaza, together with their US imperialist buddies whose contribution to the genocide has been undoubtedly critical.     As already reported , in 2007, Hamas came to power and Israel launched an offensive on Gaza Strip, leaving behind 1,400 dead Palestinians, but taking with it the gas fields. Within a year, Israel announced the discovery of the Leviathan natural gas field, which did include Gaza's riches, valued at 453 billion dollars. But Gazans have been denied around 47 billion dollars in revenue. As for Tel Aviv, it's gunning to become a new hub. At that moment in time, that is 2022, Russian oil and gas were sanctioned.

Neocon Queen Victoria Nuland Ends Her Reign: Exposing a Catastrophic Career

Glenn Greenwald    

Τυχαία γεγονότα στην τριτοκοσμική μπανανία των Βαλκανίων

failed evolution   1) Συμβαίνει το μεγαλύτερο σιδηροδρομικό δυστύχημα στην ιστορία της χώρας. 2) Γίνεται αστραπιαία επιχείρηση μοντάζ των συνομιλιών του σταθμάρχη από μηχανισμό του καθεστώτος, πριν ακόμα φτάσει στα χέρια των αρχών, προκειμένου να αποδοθεί η τραγωδία αποκλειστικά σε ανθρώπινο λάθος και να βγουν από το κάδρο οι πολιτικές ευθύνες ανώτατων κυβερνητικών αξιωματούχων. 3) Αναπαράγεται το παραποιημένο υλικό αστραπιαία από ναυαρχίδα της καθεστωτικής προπαγάνδας. 4) Τοποθετείται επικεφαλής στην επιτροπή-παρωδία πρωτοπαλίκαρο του καθεστώτος Μητσοτάκη που εργάζονταν παλιά στην ίδια αυτή ναυαρχίδα. 5) Η επιτροπή κλείνει άρον-άρον την υπόθεση αποκλείοντας ουσιώδεις μάρτυρες που είχαν προειδοποιήσει επανειλημμένα τον αρμόδιο υπουργό για τον κίνδυνο μεγάλου δυστυχήματος. Σταματάει έτσι και η όποια σε βάθος διερεύνηση για την τσιμεντοποίηση του χώρου και την απόπειρα συγκάλυψης της τραγωδίας.  

Το σκάσιμο της φούσκας Μητσοτάκη με νέα επίσημη χρεοκοπία και οριστικό τέλος της μεταπολίτευσης

του system failure   Τα αποτελέσματα των εκλογών της 25ης Ιουνίου ήταν λίγο-πολύ αναμενόμενα όσον αφορά τις πρώτες θέσεις με βάση και τα αποτελέσματα της πρώτης κάλπης του Μαίου. Αν συμπεριλάβουμε και το ποσοστό της αναμενόμενης αποχής, δεν μας έδωσαν κάποια ιδιαίτερη έκπληξη. Αυτό όμως που φαίνεται να αιφνιδίασε ακόμα και το συστημικό κατεστημένο, είναι η είσοδος των δύο υπερσυντηρητικών, ακροδεξιών κομμάτων Νίκη και Σπαρτιάτες, με το τελευταίο να έχει ξεκάθαρες διασυνδέσεις με τον πρώην Χρυσαυγίτη, Ηλία Κασιδιάρη. Παρά τη μεγάλη νίκη Μητσοτάκη, οι μιντιακοί ινστρούχτορες της καθεστωτικής προπαγάνδας εμφανίστηκαν σε γενικές γραμμές "μουδιασμένοι" και αυτό οφείλεται στο γεγονός ότι το συστημικό κατεστημένο (δηλαδή τα μεγάλα οικονομικά συμφέροντα που ελέγχουν και το σύνολο των μεγάλων ΜΜΕ πανελλαδικής εμβέλειας), πέτυχε μόνο έναν από τους τέσσερις μεγάλους στόχους που είχε θέσει εξ'αρχής. Μιλώντας με ποδοσφαιρικούς όρους, ουσιαστικά έχασε με σκορ 3-1.   Ο μεγάλος στόχος πο

The Shadowy, Intelligence-Linked Group Driving the US Towards War With Iran

"United Against Nuclear Iran does not miss an opportunity to try to bring the United States closer to a military conflict with Iran. And on the other side of the equation, they also have worked very hard to oppose efforts to de-escalate the U.S.-Iran relationship."   by Alan Macleod   Part 7 - A Lesson From History   The history of Iran has been intimately intertwined with the United States since at least 1953 when Washington orchestrated a successful coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. Mosaddegh had refused U.S. demands to stamp out Communist influences in his country and had nationalized the nation’s oil. The U.S. installed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as a puppet ruler. An unpopular and authoritarian ruler, the Shah was overthrown in the Revolution of 1979. Since then, it has become a target for regime change, and its nuclear program is something of an obsession in the West. Often orchestrated by UANI officials while they were in government, the U.S. has carried

How the CIA oversees the Ukraine proxy war on Russia

Geopolitical Economy Report   Several reports in mainstream US media outlets show how the CIA has helped to direct the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, and played a role in causing the conflict in the first place. Ben Norton examines the evidence.   Related: Confirmed: US imperialists wanted to drag Russia into a war with Ukraine since at least 2019

Israel Carries Out Most Sadistic Massacre, Opens Fire On Gaza Aid Convoy

Richard Medhurst  

The real reason behind TikTok ban

Glenn Greenwald /  Richard Medhurst